Madagascar vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Madagascar
0.0034 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Mozambique
0.0026 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Madagascar rank
143rd
Mozambique rank
146th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Madagascar
  • Mozambique
00.020.040.060.08196119922024

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.0034 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.

Madagascar ranks 143rd and Mozambique ranks 146th of 167 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0779 1000 Int$ per person 0.0159 1000 Int$ per person 0.062 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar
1970s 0.0637 1000 Int$ per person 0.0151 1000 Int$ per person 0.0485 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar
1980s 0.0572 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person 0.0455 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar
1990s 0.0174 1000 Int$ per person 0.0039 1000 Int$ per person 0.0136 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar
2000s 0.0092 1000 Int$ per person 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar
2010s 0.0072 1000 Int$ per person 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person 0.0053 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar
2020s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Madagascar or Mozambique?
Madagascar, at 0.0034 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Madagascar and Mozambique?
0.0008 1000 Int$ per person, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mozambique?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Mozambique rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Madagascar ranks 143rd and Mozambique ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/madagascar/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/madagascar/mozambique/">Madagascar vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.