Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Equatorial Guinea
0.0001 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Liberia
0.0007 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
157th
Liberia rank
154th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Liberia
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Liberia's figure about 6.8 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th and Liberia ranks 154th of 167 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person Liberia
1970s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person Liberia
1980s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person Liberia
1990s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person Liberia
2000s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person Liberia
2010s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person Liberia
2020s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Liberia?
Liberia, at 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
0.0006 1000 Int$ per person, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Liberia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th and Liberia ranks 154th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/equatorial-guinea/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/equatorial-guinea/liberia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.