How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zambia?

50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Rwanda

125.28

in 2024

Zambia

126.27

in 2024

Rwanda rank

43rd

Zambia rank

41st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Rwanda
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 126.27 against 125.28 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.99.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 41st of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	16.22	13.93	2.3	Rwanda
1970s	26.56	15.09	11.46	Rwanda
1980s	39.75	17.91	21.84	Rwanda
1990s	42.08	31.42	10.66	Rwanda
2000s	92.81	42.72	50.09	Rwanda
2010s	93.46	100.74	7.28	Zambia
2020s	119.3	113.74	5.56	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Rwanda or Zambia?: Zambia, at 126.27 against 125.28 in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Rwanda and Zambia?: 0.99, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zambia?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Rwanda ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 41st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number/rwanda/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number/rwanda/zambia/">Rwanda vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 226 places, 13,069 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.