How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?

29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Bosnia and Herzegovina

58.24

in 2024

Kenya

57.39

in 2024

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

161st

Kenya rank

162nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Kenya

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 58.24 against 57.39 in Kenya, a difference of 0.85.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kenya ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 161st and Kenya ranks 162nd of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Kenya	Difference	Ahead
1990s	33.77	115.97	82.2	Kenya
2000s	68.47	131.33	62.86	Kenya
2010s	107.64	97.84	9.8	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	64.33	55.38	8.96	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kenya?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 58.24 against 57.39 in Kenya as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?: 0.85, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 161st and Kenya ranks 162nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kenya/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 226 places, 13,069 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.