Ecuador vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)

Ecuador
2,896 SLC
in 2024
New Zealand
2,634 SLC
in 2023
Ecuador rank
97th
New Zealand rank
99th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
01.0k2.0k3.0k199120072024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,896 SLC against 2,634 SLC in New Zealand, a difference of 262 SLC.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Ecuador ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 99th of 113 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 135.99 SLC 1,024 SLC 888.12 SLC New Zealand
2000s 1,269 SLC 1,538 SLC 269.49 SLC New Zealand
2010s 1,664 SLC 2,032 SLC 368.19 SLC New Zealand
2020s 2,046 SLC 2,530 SLC 484.17 SLC New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological), Ecuador or New Zealand?
Ecuador, at 2,896 SLC against 2,634 SLC in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) between Ecuador and New Zealand?
262 SLC, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)?
Ecuador ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 99th of 113 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price (SLC/tonne). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-slc-tonne/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-slc-tonne/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price (SLC/tonne)
Unit
SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 2,697 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.