Nigeria vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat and meat products — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents)

Nigeria
38 μg/cap/d
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
45 μg/cap/d
in 2023
Nigeria rank
157th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
155th

Meat and meat products — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) over time

  • Nigeria
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0204060201020162023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 45 μg/cap/d against 38 μg/cap/d in Nigeria, a difference of 7 μg/cap/d.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 157th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 155th of 163 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2010s 44.6 μg/cap/d 28.4 μg/cap/d 16.2 μg/cap/d Nigeria
2020s 39.25 μg/cap/d 37.75 μg/cap/d 1.5 μg/cap/d Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat and meat products — vitamin a supply (retinol equivalents), Nigeria or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 45 μg/cap/d against 38 μg/cap/d in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat and meat products — vitamin a supply (retinol equivalents) between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 μg/cap/d, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat and meat products — vitamin a supply (retinol equivalents)?
Nigeria ranks 157th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 155th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat and meat products — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat and meat products — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-and-meat-products-vitamin-a-supply-retinol-equivalents-value/nigeria/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-and-meat-products-vitamin-a-supply-retinol-equivalents-value/nigeria/sao-tome-and-principe/">Nigeria vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat and meat products — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat and meat products — Vitamin A supply (retinol equivalents) — Value
Unit
μg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.