Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value

Bosnia and Herzegovina
324 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Ecuador
349 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
97th
Ecuador rank
94th

Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ecuador
0100200300400201020162023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 349 mg/cap/d against 324 mg/cap/d in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 25 mg/cap/d.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th and Ecuador ranks 94th of 163 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 245.5 mg/cap/d 330.6 mg/cap/d 85.1 mg/cap/d Ecuador
2020s 301.25 mg/cap/d 340.75 mg/cap/d 39.5 mg/cap/d Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat and meat products — potassium supply — value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 349 mg/cap/d against 324 mg/cap/d in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat and meat products — potassium supply — value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
25 mg/cap/d, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for meat and meat products — potassium supply — value?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th and Ecuador ranks 94th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-and-meat-products-potassium-supply-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-and-meat-products-potassium-supply-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.