Australia vs Belarus: Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value

Australia
731 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Belarus
722 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Australia rank
6th
Belarus rank
7th

Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
0200400600800201020162023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 731 mg/cap/d against 722 mg/cap/d in Belarus, a difference of 9 mg/cap/d.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 6th and Belarus ranks 7th of 163 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
2010s 750.6 mg/cap/d 530.6 mg/cap/d 220 mg/cap/d Australia
2020s 715.25 mg/cap/d 643 mg/cap/d 72.25 mg/cap/d Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat and meat products — potassium supply — value, Australia or Belarus?
Australia, at 731 mg/cap/d against 722 mg/cap/d in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat and meat products — potassium supply — value between Australia and Belarus?
9 mg/cap/d, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for meat and meat products — potassium supply — value?
Australia ranks 6th and Belarus ranks 7th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-and-meat-products-potassium-supply-value/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-and-meat-products-potassium-supply-value/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat and meat products — Potassium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.