Armenia vs Ecuador: Maize and products — Processing
Maize and products — Processing over time
- Armenia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 46 1000 t against 36 1000 t in Armenia, a difference of 10 1000 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 47th and Ecuador ranks 46th of 103 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 11 1000 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 33.33 1000 t | 38 1000 t | 4.67 1000 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize and products — processing, Armenia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 46 1000 t against 36 1000 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in maize and products — processing between Armenia and Ecuador?
- 10 1000 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Ecuador?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Ecuador rank globally for maize and products — processing?
- Armenia ranks 47th and Ecuador ranks 46th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize and products — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.