Malawi vs Poland: Maize and products — Losses
Maize and products — Losses over time
- Malawi
- Poland
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 451 1000 t against 320 1000 t in Poland, a difference of 131 1000 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Poland's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 16th and Poland ranks 18th of 145 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 634.5 1000 t | 132 1000 t | 502.5 1000 t | Malawi |
| 2020s | 493.25 1000 t | 319.75 1000 t | 173.5 1000 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize and products — losses, Malawi or Poland?
- Malawi, at 451 1000 t against 320 1000 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in maize and products — losses between Malawi and Poland?
- 131 1000 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Poland rank globally for maize and products — losses?
- Malawi ranks 16th and Poland ranks 18th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize and products — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.