Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Viet Nam: Jute — Other uses

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
46 t
in 2013
Viet Nam
303 t
in 2013
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
5th
Viet Nam rank
3rd

Jute — Other uses over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Viet Nam
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119872013

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 303 t against 46 t in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 257 t.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 6.6 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 13 countries.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1960s 6,011 t 17,488 t 11,477 t Viet Nam
1970s 7,624 t 21,706 t 14,082 t Viet Nam
1980s 9,766 t 35,533 t 25,767 t Viet Nam
1990s 6,671 t 14,540 t 7,869 t Viet Nam
2000s 1,704 t 12,450 t 10,745 t Viet Nam
2010s 100.75 t 4,889 t 4,788 t Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute — other uses, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 303 t against 46 t in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2013.
What is the difference in jute — other uses between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Viet Nam?
257 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Viet Nam?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Viet Nam rank globally for jute — other uses?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Viet Nam: Jute — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-other-uses-non-food/iran-islamic-republic-of/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-other-uses-non-food/iran-islamic-republic-of/viet-nam-2/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Viet Nam: Jute — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 9,035 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.