Belarus vs Greece: Jute — Other uses
Jute — Other uses over time
- Belarus
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 187 t against 164 t in Belarus, a difference of 23 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Greece ahead.
Belarus ranks 38th and Greece ranks 36th of 144 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27 t | 34.38 t | 7.38 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 16.9 t | 362.6 t | 345.7 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 52 t | 279 t | 227 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher jute — other uses, Belarus or Greece?
- Greece, at 187 t against 164 t in Belarus as of 2013.
- What is the difference in jute — other uses between Belarus and Greece?
- 23 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Greece?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Greece rank globally for jute — other uses?
- Belarus ranks 38th and Greece ranks 36th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.