Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Jute — Domestic supply quantity

Northern America
1,520 t
in 2013
Zimbabwe
2,528 t
in 2013
Northern America rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
19th

Jute — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Northern America
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2,528 t against 1,520 t in Northern America, a difference of 1,008 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.7 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Northern America ahead.

Northern America ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 28 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Northern America averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 60,060 t 1,050 t 59,011 t Northern America
1970s 22,612 t 969.8 t 21,642 t Northern America
1980s 13,771 t 917.3 t 12,854 t Northern America
1990s 2,601 t 1,508 t 1,093 t Northern America
2000s -18.8 t 2,124 t 2,143 t Zimbabwe
2010s 985.75 t 2,417 t 1,431 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute — domestic supply quantity, Northern America or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2,528 t against 1,520 t in Northern America as of 2013.
What is the difference in jute — domestic supply quantity between Northern America and Zimbabwe?
1,008 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Zimbabwe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Northern America and Zimbabwe rank globally for jute — domestic supply quantity?
Northern America ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Jute — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-domestic-supply-quantity/northern-america/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-domestic-supply-quantity/northern-america/zimbabwe/">Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Jute — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
187 places, 9,102 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.