Japan vs Lithuania: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Japan
24,118 USD
in 2024
Lithuania
21,035 USD
in 2024
Japan rank
41st
Lithuania rank
44th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Japan
  • Lithuania
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199120072024

How they compare

Japan currently reports 24,118 USD against 21,035 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 3,083 USD.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 44th of 168 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 15,763 USD 5,158 USD 10,606 USD Japan
2000s 18,492 USD 6,025 USD 12,467 USD Japan
2010s 18,980 USD 12,192 USD 6,788 USD Japan
2020s 21,793 USD 20,008 USD 1,785 USD Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Japan or Lithuania?
Japan, at 24,118 USD against 21,035 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Japan and Lithuania?
3,083 USD, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Japan ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 44th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Lithuania: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/japan/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/japan/lithuania/">Japan vs Lithuania: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.