Guyana vs United Arab Emirates: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Guyana
40,441 USD
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
39,003 USD
in 2024
Guyana rank
28th
United Arab Emirates rank
31st

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Guyana
  • United Arab Emirates
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120072024

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 40,441 USD against 39,003 USD in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 1,438 USD.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Guyana ranks 28th and United Arab Emirates ranks 31st of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 3,014 USD 24,849 USD 21,835 USD United Arab Emirates
2000s 11,399 USD 28,925 USD 17,526 USD United Arab Emirates
2010s 23,197 USD 18,652 USD 4,545 USD Guyana
2020s 33,570 USD 36,723 USD 3,153 USD United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Guyana or United Arab Emirates?
Guyana, at 40,441 USD against 39,003 USD in United Arab Emirates as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Guyana and United Arab Emirates?
1,438 USD, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and United Arab Emirates?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Guyana and United Arab Emirates rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Guyana ranks 28th and United Arab Emirates ranks 31st of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs United Arab Emirates: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/guyana/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/guyana/united-arab-emirates/">Guyana vs United Arab Emirates: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.