Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
27,030 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
9,100 t
in 2013
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119872013

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 27,030 t against 9,100 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 17,930 t.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 3.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 140 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1,403 t 4,771 t 3,368 t United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 2,303 t 6,742 t 4,439 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 2,436 t 8,612 t 6,176 t United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 6,370 t 9,454 t 3,085 t United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 21,806 t 8,707 t 13,100 t Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 23,147 t 8,712 t 14,435 t Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — other uses, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 27,030 t against 9,100 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — other uses between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and United Republic of Tanzania?
17,930 t, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for hard fibres, other — other uses?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 8,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.