Czechoslovakia vs French Polynesia: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity

Czechoslovakia
0 t
in 1992
French Polynesia
0 t
in 2013
Czechoslovakia rank
123rd
French Polynesia rank
123rd

Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • French Polynesia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119872013

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Czechoslovakia ranks 123rd and French Polynesia ranks 123rd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and French Polynesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,862 t 0.6667 t 1,861 t Czechoslovakia
1970s 3,903 t 0.3 t 3,903 t Czechoslovakia
1980s 3,410 t 0.6 t 3,409 t Czechoslovakia
1990s 0 t 1 t 1 t French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other — import quantity, Czechoslovakia or French Polynesia?
Czechoslovakia, at 0 t against 0 t in French Polynesia as of 1992.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other — import quantity between Czechoslovakia and French Polynesia?
0 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and French Polynesia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and French Polynesia rank globally for hard fibres, other — import quantity?
Czechoslovakia ranks 123rd and French Polynesia ranks 123rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs French Polynesia: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/czechoslovakia/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-import-quantity/czechoslovakia/french-polynesia/">Czechoslovakia vs French Polynesia: Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 8,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.