Eastern Europe vs Lithuania, Republic of: Hard Fibres, Other β€” Export Quantity

Eastern Europe
372 t
in 2013
Lithuania, Republic of
189 t
in 2013
Eastern Europe rank
14th
Lithuania, Republic of rank
22nd

Hard Fibres, Other β€” Export Quantity over time

  • Eastern Europe
  • Lithuania, Republic of
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119872013

How they compare

Eastern Europe currently reports 372 t against 189 t in Lithuania, Republic of, a difference of 183 t.

That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 2.0 times Lithuania, Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania, Republic of ahead.

Eastern Europe ranks 14th and Lithuania, Republic of ranks 22nd of 24 regions.

Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Europe Lithuania, Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 103.88 t 5.38 t 98.5 t Eastern Europe
2000s 304.4 t 5.6 t 298.8 t Eastern Europe
2010s 157.25 t 105.5 t 51.75 t Eastern Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hard fibres, other β€” export quantity, Eastern Europe or Lithuania, Republic of?
Eastern Europe, at 372 t against 189 t in Lithuania, Republic of as of 2013.
What is the difference in hard fibres, other β€” export quantity between Eastern Europe and Lithuania, Republic of?
183 t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Lithuania, Republic of?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Eastern Europe and Lithuania, Republic of rank globally for hard fibres, other β€” export quantity?
Eastern Europe ranks 14th and Lithuania, Republic of ranks 22nd of 24 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hard Fibres, Other β€” Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Europe vs Lithuania, Republic of: Hard Fibres, Other β€” Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/eastern-europe/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/hard-fibres-other-export-quantity/eastern-europe/lithuania/">Eastern Europe vs Lithuania, Republic of: Hard Fibres, Other β€” Export Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hard Fibres, Other β€” Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 6,522 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.