Brazil vs Myanmar: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Non-agricultural
Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Non-agricultural over time
- Brazil
- Myanmar
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 9.29 % against 8.66 % in Myanmar, a difference of 0.63 %.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 29th of 55 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.72 % | 8.54 % | 2.18 % | Brazil |
| 2020s | 14.3 % | 8.66 % | 5.64 % | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: non-agricultural, Brazil or Myanmar?
- Brazil, at 9.29 % against 8.66 % in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: non-agricultural between Brazil and Myanmar?
- 0.63 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Myanmar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Myanmar rank globally for gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: non-agricultural?
- Brazil ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 29th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Non-agricultural employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.