Latvia vs Mali: Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Total employment in
Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Total employment in over time
- Latvia
- Mali
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17.83 % against 17.56 % in Mali, a difference of 0.27 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mali ahead.
Latvia ranks 87th and Mali ranks 89th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.18 % | 20.75 % | 10.57 % | Mali |
| 2010s | 15.91 % | 11.04 % | 4.87 % | Latvia |
| 2020s | 16.32 % | 17.63 % | 1.31 % | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in share of employment in industry: total employment in, Latvia or Mali?
- Latvia, at 17.83 % against 17.56 % in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in share of employment in industry: total employment in between Latvia and Mali?
- 0.27 %, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for gender gap in share of employment in industry: total employment in?
- Latvia ranks 87th and Mali ranks 89th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Total employment in agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.