Lesotho vs Philippines: Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in
Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in over time
- Lesotho
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 45.9 % against 44.62 % in Lesotho, a difference of 1.28 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 71st and Philippines ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.75 % | 48.63 % | 3.12 % | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 48.08 % | 48.98 % | 0.906 % | Philippines |
| 2020s | 44.42 % | 48.27 % | 3.85 % | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in, Lesotho or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 45.9 % against 44.62 % in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in between Lesotho and Philippines?
- 1.28 %, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Philippines?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Philippines rank globally for gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in?
- Lesotho ranks 71st and Philippines ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.