Lebanon vs Namibia: Fruits - Excluding Wine — Import quantity
Fruits - Excluding Wine — Import quantity over time
- Lebanon
- Namibia
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 109 1000 t against 105 1000 t in Namibia, a difference of 4 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 91st and Namibia ranks 93rd of 182 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 132.3 1000 t | 130.4 1000 t | 1.9 1000 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 81 1000 t | 108 1000 t | 27 1000 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruits - excluding wine — import quantity, Lebanon or Namibia?
- Lebanon, at 109 1000 t against 105 1000 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruits - excluding wine — import quantity between Lebanon and Namibia?
- 4 1000 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Namibia rank globally for fruits - excluding wine — import quantity?
- Lebanon ranks 91st and Namibia ranks 93rd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fruits - Excluding Wine — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.