Serbia vs Spain: Food production index
Serbia
98.37 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Spain
98.83 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Serbia rank
152nd
Spain rank
150th
Food production index over time
- Serbia
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 98.83 2014-2016 = 100 against 98.37 2014-2016 = 100 in Serbia, a difference of 0.46 2014-2016 = 100.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 152nd and Spain ranks 150th of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.34 2014-2016 = 100 | 93.53 2014-2016 = 100 | 4.81 2014-2016 = 100 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 99.02 2014-2016 = 100 | 101.01 2014-2016 = 100 | 2 2014-2016 = 100 | Spain |
| 2020s | 104.51 2014-2016 = 100 | 111.02 2014-2016 = 100 | 6.51 2014-2016 = 100 | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food production index, Serbia or Spain?
- Spain, at 98.83 2014-2016 = 100 against 98.37 2014-2016 = 100 in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in food production index between Serbia and Spain?
- 0.46 2014-2016 = 100, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Spain?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Serbia and Spain rank globally for food production index?
- Serbia ranks 152nd and Spain ranks 150th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.