Indonesia vs Sudan: Food production index
Indonesia
117.14 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Sudan
116.41 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Indonesia rank
52nd
Sudan rank
55th
Food production index over time
- Indonesia
- Sudan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 117.14 2014-2016 = 100 against 116.41 2014-2016 = 100 in Sudan, a difference of 0.73 2014-2016 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 55th of 195 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 104.52 2014-2016 = 100 | 101.01 2014-2016 = 100 | 3.51 2014-2016 = 100 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 113.21 2014-2016 = 100 | 114.7 2014-2016 = 100 | 1.49 2014-2016 = 100 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food production index, Indonesia or Sudan?
- Indonesia, at 117.14 2014-2016 = 100 against 116.41 2014-2016 = 100 in Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in food production index between Indonesia and Sudan?
- 0.73 2014-2016 = 100, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Sudan rank globally for food production index?
- Indonesia ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 55th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.