What is the difference in food production index between IDA blend and Oman?

70.06 2014-2016 = 100, with Oman ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Oman?

60 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IDA blend vs Oman: Food production index

IDA blend

100 2014-2016 = 100

in 2020

Oman

170.06 2014-2016 = 100

in 2022

IDA blend rank

1st

Oman rank

3rd

Food production index over time

IDA blend
Oman

How they compare

Oman currently reports 170.06 2014-2016 = 100 against 100 2014-2016 = 100 in IDA blend, a difference of 70.06 2014-2016 = 100.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.7 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1961 it was IDA blend ahead.

IDA blend ranks 1st and Oman ranks 3rd of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, IDA blend averaged higher in 5 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IDA blend	Oman	Difference	Ahead
1960s	100 2014-2016 = 100	10.21 2014-2016 = 100	89.79 2014-2016 = 100	IDA blend
1970s	100 2014-2016 = 100	14.96 2014-2016 = 100	85.05 2014-2016 = 100	IDA blend
1980s	100 2014-2016 = 100	31.98 2014-2016 = 100	68.02 2014-2016 = 100	IDA blend
1990s	100 2014-2016 = 100	48.97 2014-2016 = 100	51.03 2014-2016 = 100	IDA blend
2000s	100 2014-2016 = 100	67.78 2014-2016 = 100	32.22 2014-2016 = 100	IDA blend
2010s	100 2014-2016 = 100	105.45 2014-2016 = 100	5.45 2014-2016 = 100	Oman
2020s	100 2014-2016 = 100	140.87 2014-2016 = 100	40.87 2014-2016 = 100	Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food production index, IDA blend or Oman?: Oman, at 170.06 2014-2016 = 100 against 100 2014-2016 = 100 in IDA blend as of 2022.
What is the difference in food production index between IDA blend and Oman?: 70.06 2014-2016 = 100, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Oman?: 60 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2020.
How do IDA blend and Oman rank globally for food production index?: IDA blend ranks 1st and Oman ranks 3rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Oman: Food production index. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/ida-blend/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/ida-blend/oman/">IDA blend vs Oman: Food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit: 2014-2016 = 100
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 242 places, 13,707 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.