What is the difference in food production index between Denmark and Malaysia?

1.03 2014-2016 = 100, with Denmark ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malaysia?

62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Denmark vs Malaysia: Food production index

Denmark

103.83 2014-2016 = 100

in 2022

Malaysia

102.8 2014-2016 = 100

in 2022

Denmark rank

112th

Malaysia rank

115th

Food production index over time

Denmark
Malaysia

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 103.83 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.8 2014-2016 = 100 in Malaysia, a difference of 1.03 2014-2016 = 100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 112th and Malaysia ranks 115th of 195 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Denmark	Malaysia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	67.28 2014-2016 = 100	21.29 2014-2016 = 100	45.99 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark
1970s	70.53 2014-2016 = 100	31.49 2014-2016 = 100	39.04 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark
1980s	85.25 2014-2016 = 100	40.38 2014-2016 = 100	44.87 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark
1990s	94.52 2014-2016 = 100	60.35 2014-2016 = 100	34.17 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark
2000s	97.87 2014-2016 = 100	67.26 2014-2016 = 100	30.61 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark
2010s	98.73 2014-2016 = 100	93.74 2014-2016 = 100	4.99 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark
2020s	103.15 2014-2016 = 100	102.81 2014-2016 = 100	0.3333 2014-2016 = 100	Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food production index, Denmark or Malaysia?: Denmark, at 103.83 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.8 2014-2016 = 100 in Malaysia as of 2022.
What is the difference in food production index between Denmark and Malaysia?: 1.03 2014-2016 = 100, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malaysia?: 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Denmark and Malaysia rank globally for food production index?: Denmark ranks 112th and Malaysia ranks 115th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Malaysia: Food production index. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/denmark/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/denmark/malaysia/">Denmark vs Malaysia: Food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit: 2014-2016 = 100
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 242 places, 13,707 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.