Panama vs Rwanda: Fish, Seafood — Food supply
Fish, Seafood — Food supply over time
- Panama
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 53,567 million Kcal against 51,191 million Kcal in Panama, a difference of 2,376 million Kcal.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45,981 million Kcal | 43,467 million Kcal | 2,514 million Kcal | Panama |
| 2020s | 51,191 million Kcal | 53,541 million Kcal | 2,350 million Kcal | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish, seafood — food supply, Panama or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 53,567 million Kcal against 51,191 million Kcal in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fish, seafood — food supply between Panama and Rwanda?
- 2,376 million Kcal, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Rwanda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Rwanda rank globally for fish, seafood — food supply?
- Panama ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fish, Seafood — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.