Belarus vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing

Belarus
24 1000 t
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
62 1000 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
6th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
3rd

Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing over time

  • Belarus
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0204060201020162023

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 62 1000 t against 24 1000 t in Belarus, a difference of 38 1000 t.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 2.6 times Belarus's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 6th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 3rd of 32 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1111 1000 t 44.22 1000 t 44.11 1000 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 7.5 1000 t 48 1000 t 40.5 1000 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fats, animals, raw — processing, Belarus or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 62 1000 t against 24 1000 t in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in fats, animals, raw — processing between Belarus and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
38 1000 t, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Belarus and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for fats, animals, raw — processing?
Belarus ranks 6th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 3rd of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fats-animals-raw-processing/belarus/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fats-animals-raw-processing/belarus/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Belarus vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
54 places, 712 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.