Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Democratic Republic of the Congo
102.09
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
104.73
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0255075100125196119922024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 104.73 against 102.09 in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 2.64.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 12 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 44.43 9.43 35 Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 65.67 24.19 41.49 Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 97.7 93.81 3.89 Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 102.24 105.15 2.9 United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 104.73 against 102.09 in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
2.64, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 5,482 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.