Congo vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time
- Congo
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Congo currently reports 107.67 against 101.65 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 6.02.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Congo ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th of 63 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30.43 | 44.41 | 13.98 | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 36.28 | 75.52 | 39.24 | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 43.64 | 157.83 | 114.19 | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 62.62 | 94.38 | 31.76 | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 66.98 | 73.45 | 6.47 | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 99.98 | 97.9 | 2.08 | Congo |
| 2020s | 107.24 | 101.81 | 5.43 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Congo or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Congo, at 107.67 against 101.65 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Congo and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 6.02, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Congo ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.