Palestine vs Zimbabwe: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Palestine
149 1000 Int$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
262 1000 Int$
in 2024
Palestine rank
59th
Zimbabwe rank
57th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Palestine
  • Zimbabwe
200400600800198420042024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 262 1000 Int$ against 149 1000 Int$ in Palestine, a difference of 113 1000 Int$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.8 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Palestine ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 76 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Palestine averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palestine Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 471.67 1000 Int$ 262 1000 Int$ 209.67 1000 Int$ Palestine
2000s 552.12 1000 Int$ 262 1000 Int$ 290.12 1000 Int$ Palestine
2010s 159.5 1000 Int$ 262 1000 Int$ 102.5 1000 Int$ Zimbabwe
2020s 147.33 1000 Int$ 262 1000 Int$ 114.67 1000 Int$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Palestine or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 262 1000 Int$ against 149 1000 Int$ in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Palestine and Zimbabwe?
113 1000 Int$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palestine and Zimbabwe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Palestine and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Palestine ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palestine vs Zimbabwe: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/west-bank-and-gaza/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/west-bank-and-gaza/zimbabwe/">Palestine vs Zimbabwe: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
114 places, 5,882 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.