Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Congo
86.68
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
86.53
in 2024
Congo rank
42nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Congo
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 86.68 against 86.53 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Congo ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 63 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 127.9 10,892 10,764 Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 116.2 16,756 16,640 Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 108.2 5,090 4,982 Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 118.21 2,333 2,215 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 93.43 1,950 1,857 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 101.32 114.35 13.03 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 90.62 90.45 0.17 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?
Congo, at 86.68 against 86.53 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.15, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Congo ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 63 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-per-capita/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-per-capita/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 5,482 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.