Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Small island developing States (SIDS)
79,744 ha
in 2024
Thailand
17,040 ha
in 2024
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
6th
Thailand rank
8th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
  • Thailand
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922024

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 79,744 ha against 17,040 ha in Thailand, a difference of 62,704 ha.

That makes Small island developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 4.7 times Thailand's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Small island developing States (SIDS) has been ahead every year.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 6th and Thailand ranks 8th of 13 groups.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small island developing States (SIDS) Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 58,218 ha 2,144 ha 56,074 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
1970s 69,680 ha 3,520 ha 66,160 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
1980s 81,877 ha 4,661 ha 77,215 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
1990s 76,691 ha 5,372 ha 71,319 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
2000s 78,177 ha 10,783 ha 67,394 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
2010s 84,265 ha 16,056 ha 68,210 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 82,270 ha 17,116 ha 65,154 ha Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Small island developing States (SIDS) or Thailand?
Small island developing States (SIDS), at 79,744 ha against 17,040 ha in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Small island developing States (SIDS) and Thailand?
62,704 ha, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and Thailand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and Thailand rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 6th and Thailand ranks 8th of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-area-harvested/small-island-developing-states-sids/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-area-harvested/small-island-developing-states-sids/thailand/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Area harvested
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
112 places, 5,943 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.