Colombia vs Congo: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Colombia
97.14 t
in 2024
Congo
92.57 t
in 2024
Colombia rank
171st
Congo rank
174th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Colombia
  • Congo
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922024

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 97.14 t against 92.57 t in Congo, a difference of 4.57 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 171st and Congo ranks 174th of 234 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 944.18 t 18.54 t 925.65 t Colombia
1970s 1,302 t 20.47 t 1,282 t Colombia
1980s 1,697 t 48.03 t 1,649 t Colombia
1990s 1,491 t 75.43 t 1,416 t Colombia
2000s 700.24 t 71.63 t 628.61 t Colombia
2010s 112.35 t 88.77 t 23.58 t Colombia
2020s 104.51 t 91.55 t 12.96 t Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Colombia or Congo?
Colombia, at 97.14 t against 92.57 t in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Colombia and Congo?
4.57 t, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Congo?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Colombia and Congo rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Colombia ranks 171st and Congo ranks 174th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Congo: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/colombia/congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/colombia/congo/">Colombia vs Congo: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 14,768 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.