Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Belize
17.01 t
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
19.6 t
in 2024
Belize rank
196th
Equatorial Guinea rank
194th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Belize
  • Equatorial Guinea
05101520196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 19.6 t against 17.01 t in Belize, a difference of 2.59 t.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Belize's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 196th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 194th of 234 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6311 t 10.63 t 9.99 t Equatorial Guinea
1970s 1.1 t 12.35 t 11.25 t Equatorial Guinea
1980s 1.3 t 13.77 t 12.47 t Equatorial Guinea
1990s 1.11 t 15.72 t 14.61 t Equatorial Guinea
2000s 2.8 t 17.36 t 14.56 t Equatorial Guinea
2010s 5.31 t 18.52 t 13.21 t Equatorial Guinea
2020s 14.28 t 19.38 t 5.1 t Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 19.6 t against 17.01 t in Belize as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
2.59 t, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Belize ranks 196th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 194th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/belize/equatorial-guinea-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/belize/equatorial-guinea-2/">Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 14,768 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.