Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Mauritius
0 t per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0 t per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
140th
New Caledonia rank
142nd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Caledonia
00000196119922024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 140th and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person New Caledonia
1970s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person New Caledonia
1980s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person New Caledonia
1990s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person New Caledonia
2000s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Mauritius
2010s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person New Caledonia
2020s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
Mauritius, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
0 t per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Mauritius ranks 140th and New Caledonia ranks 142nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/mauritius/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/mauritius/new-caledonia/">Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,090 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.