Bhutan vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bhutan
0 t per person
in 2024
Suriname
0 t per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
139th
Suriname rank
138th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bhutan
  • Suriname
00000196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 139th and Suriname ranks 138th of 160 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Bhutan
1970s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Bhutan
1980s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Bhutan
1990s 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Bhutan
2020s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bhutan or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bhutan and Suriname?
0 t per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
34 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bhutan ranks 139th and Suriname ranks 138th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bhutan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bhutan/suriname/">Bhutan vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,090 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.