Bahrain vs New Zealand: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bahrain
0.003 t per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0105 t per person
in 2024
Bahrain rank
4th
New Zealand rank
1st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bahrain
  • New Zealand
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0105 t per person against 0.003 t per person in Bahrain, a difference of 0.0075 t per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 3.5 times Bahrain's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Bahrain ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 1st of 160 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per person 0.0234 t per person 0.0233 t per person New Zealand
1970s 0.0004 t per person 0.0218 t per person 0.0213 t per person New Zealand
1980s 0.0017 t per person 0.0244 t per person 0.0227 t per person New Zealand
1990s 0.0019 t per person 0.0179 t per person 0.016 t per person New Zealand
2000s 0.0017 t per person 0.0166 t per person 0.0149 t per person New Zealand
2010s 0.0026 t per person 0.0126 t per person 0.01 t per person New Zealand
2020s 0.003 t per person 0.0106 t per person 0.0076 t per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bahrain or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0105 t per person against 0.003 t per person in Bahrain as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bahrain and New Zealand?
0.0075 t per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bahrain and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bahrain ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 1st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahrain vs New Zealand: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bahrain/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bahrain/new-zealand/">Bahrain vs New Zealand: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,090 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.