Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 28.57 % change on previous year against 2.01 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 26.56 % change on previous year.
That makes Poland's figure about 14.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Poland ranks 10th of 30 groups.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.49 % change on previous year | -1.93 % change on previous year | 4.41 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 2.96 % change on previous year | 0.8605 % change on previous year | 2.1 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.26 % change on previous year | 1 % change on previous year | 0.2579 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 5.43 % change on previous year | -17.62 % change on previous year | 23.06 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.57 % change on previous year | -1.21 % change on previous year | 3.77 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 0.561 % change on previous year | 0.0434 % change on previous year | 0.5176 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Poland?
- Poland, at 28.57 % change on previous year against 2.01 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland?
- 26.56 % change on previous year, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Poland ranks 10th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.