Hungary vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Hungary
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 45.9 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 42.64 % change on previous year.
That makes Hungary's figure about 14.1 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 27 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
Hungary ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -2.2 % change on previous year | 2.5 % change on previous year | 4.7 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1970s | -1.36 % change on previous year | 2.58 % change on previous year | 3.94 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1980s | 7.38 % change on previous year | 0.3863 % change on previous year | 7 % change on previous year | Hungary |
| 1990s | 3.04 % change on previous year | 4.76 % change on previous year | 1.71 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | -9.25 % change on previous year | 3.07 % change on previous year | 12.31 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | 10.54 % change on previous year | 0.1929 % change on previous year | 10.35 % change on previous year | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Hungary or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Hungary, at 45.9 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Hungary and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 42.64 % change on previous year, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
- How do Hungary and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Hungary ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.