Denmark vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Denmark
-0.5656 % change on previous year
in 2017
Sao Tome and Principe
-1.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Denmark rank
112th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
115th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Denmark
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50050196219932024

How they compare

Denmark currently reports -0.5656 % change on previous year against -1.19 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.6244 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Denmark ranks 112th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 115th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 11.21 % change on previous year -5.99 % change on previous year 17.21 % change on previous year Denmark
1970s -16.24 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year 17.76 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 12.06 % change on previous year 0.7204 % change on previous year 11.34 % change on previous year Denmark
1990s 3.14 % change on previous year 4.2 % change on previous year 1.05 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 2.24 % change on previous year 1.71 % change on previous year 0.5273 % change on previous year Denmark
2010s -1.3 % change on previous year -4.81 % change on previous year 3.51 % change on previous year Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Denmark or Sao Tome and Principe?
Denmark, at -0.5656 % change on previous year against -1.19 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Denmark and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.6244 % change on previous year, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Sao Tome and Principe?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Denmark and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Denmark ranks 112th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 115th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/denmark/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/denmark/sao-tome-and-principe/">Denmark vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,429 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.