Bahamas vs Barbados: Edible offal of sheep: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Bahamas
2,173 An
in 2024
Barbados
2,576 An
in 2024
Bahamas rank
209th
Barbados rank
207th

Edible offal of sheep: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Bahamas
  • Barbados
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 2,576 An against 2,173 An in Bahamas, a difference of 403 An.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 209th and Barbados ranks 207th of 234 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Barbados in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Barbados Difference Ahead
1960s 6,633 An 5,467 An 1,167 An Bahamas
1970s 4,160 An 8,790 An 4,630 An Barbados
1980s 2,220 An 9,990 An 7,770 An Barbados
1990s 1,645 An 1,651 An 6.2 An Barbados
2000s 1,868 An 2,116 An 247.9 An Barbados
2010s 2,050 An 2,931 An 881 An Barbados
2020s 2,142 An 2,459 An 317.2 An Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Bahamas or Barbados?
Barbados, at 2,576 An against 2,173 An in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Bahamas and Barbados?
403 An, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Barbados?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Barbados rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Bahamas ranks 209th and Barbados ranks 207th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Barbados: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/bahamas/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/bahamas/barbados/">Bahamas vs Barbados: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 14,928 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.