China, Macao SAR vs Namibia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

China, Macao SAR
364.87 t
in 2024
Namibia
418.15 t
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
133rd
Namibia rank
131st

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Namibia
0200400600800196119922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 418.15 t against 364.87 t in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 53.28 t.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times China, Macao SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 131st of 225 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 224.32 t 71.56 t 152.76 t China, Macao SAR
1970s 374.1 t 116.86 t 257.24 t China, Macao SAR
1980s 550.47 t 162.61 t 387.86 t China, Macao SAR
1990s 656.56 t 129.79 t 526.77 t China, Macao SAR
2000s 673.12 t 198.38 t 474.74 t China, Macao SAR
2010s 515.35 t 402.7 t 112.65 t China, Macao SAR
2020s 366.61 t 473.44 t 106.84 t Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, China, Macao SAR or Namibia?
Namibia, at 418.15 t against 364.87 t in China, Macao SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between China, Macao SAR and Namibia?
53.28 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, Macao SAR and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
China, Macao SAR ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 131st of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Namibia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-macao-sar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-macao-sar/namibia/">China, Macao SAR vs Namibia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 14,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.