Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Cuba
270,000 An
in 2024
Zimbabwe
240,805 An
in 2024
Cuba rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Edible offal of pigs: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 270,000 An against 240,805 An in Zimbabwe, a difference of 29,195 An.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 225 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 621,111 An 148,833 An 472,278 An Cuba
1970s 704,537 An 195,350 An 509,187 An Cuba
1980s 1.10 million An 178,000 An 924,905 An Cuba
1990s 2.33 million An 209,800 An 2.12 million An Cuba
2000s 2.32 million An 194,067 An 2.13 million An Cuba
2010s 3.54 million An 231,973 An 3.31 million An Cuba
2020s 1.54 million An 239,544 An 1.30 million An Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Cuba, at 270,000 An against 240,805 An in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
29,195 An, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cuba ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 14,613 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.