Congo vs Suriname: Edible offal of pigs: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Congo
32,155 An
in 2024
Suriname
30,503 An
in 2024
Congo rank
164th
Suriname rank
166th

Edible offal of pigs: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 32,155 An against 30,503 An in Suriname, a difference of 1,652 An.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 166th of 225 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 19,822 An 5,606 An 14,216 An Congo
1970s 31,750 An 11,206 An 20,544 An Congo
1980s 27,900 An 17,858 An 10,042 An Congo
1990s 38,205 An 20,276 An 17,929 An Congo
2000s 34,089 An 22,437 An 11,652 An Congo
2010s 38,447 An 30,372 An 8,075 An Congo
2020s 34,499 An 30,590 An 3,909 An Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Congo or Suriname?
Congo, at 32,155 An against 30,503 An in Suriname as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Congo and Suriname?
1,652 An, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Congo ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 166th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/congo/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/congo/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 14,613 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.