Congo vs Uruguay: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Congo
-3.75 % change on previous year
in 2024
Uruguay
-3.99 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
135th
Uruguay rank
136th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Congo
  • Uruguay
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Congo currently reports -3.75 % change on previous year against -3.99 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0.24 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uruguay ahead.

Congo ranks 135th and Uruguay ranks 136th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 3.09 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year 1.1 % change on previous year Congo
1970s 2.41 % change on previous year 4.07 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Uruguay
1980s 3.68 % change on previous year -2.23 % change on previous year 5.92 % change on previous year Congo
1990s -1.06 % change on previous year 3.72 % change on previous year 4.78 % change on previous year Uruguay
2000s 2.5 % change on previous year -3.72 % change on previous year 6.22 % change on previous year Congo
2010s -0.4462 % change on previous year -4.54 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year Congo
2020s -2.6 % change on previous year 4.74 % change on previous year 7.34 % change on previous year Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Congo or Uruguay?
Congo, at -3.75 % change on previous year against -3.99 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Congo and Uruguay?
0.24 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Congo ranks 135th and Uruguay ranks 136th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Uruguay: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/congo-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/congo-rep/uruguay/">Congo vs Uruguay: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 12,549 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.