Congo vs Hungary: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Congo
0.0006 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
0.0005 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Congo rank
118th
Hungary rank
121st

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Congo
  • Hungary
0000.001196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0006 t per square kilometre against 0.0005 t per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 118th and Hungary ranks 121st of 146 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Hungary?
Congo, at 0.0006 t per square kilometre against 0.0005 t per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Hungary?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?
28 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
How do Congo and Hungary rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Congo ranks 118th and Hungary ranks 121st of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Hungary: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/hungary/">Congo vs Hungary: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.