Pakistan vs Sudan: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Pakistan
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
8th
Sudan rank
11th
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Pakistan
- Sudan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0006 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 8th and Sudan ranks 11th of 146 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Pakistan or Sudan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0006 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Pakistan and Sudan?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Pakistan ranks 8th and Sudan ranks 11th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.