Eswatini vs Sudan: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Eswatini
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
13th
Sudan rank
11th
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 t per person.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 11th of 146 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0 t per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0 t per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Eswatini ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 11th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.