Western Europe vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Western Europe
367,476 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
107,887 t
in 2024
Western Europe rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Western Europe
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922024

How they compare

Western Europe currently reports 367,476 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 259,589 t.

That makes Western Europe's figure about 3.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Western Europe has been ahead every year.

Western Europe ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 30 groups.

Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Western Europe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 404,421 t 8,078 t 396,343 t Western Europe
1970s 473,260 t 13,967 t 459,293 t Western Europe
1980s 538,295 t 11,144 t 527,151 t Western Europe
1990s 505,348 t 69,278 t 436,069 t Western Europe
2000s 420,051 t 80,574 t 339,477 t Western Europe
2010s 402,066 t 91,276 t 310,791 t Western Europe
2020s 378,315 t 101,426 t 276,889 t Western Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Western Europe or Zimbabwe?
Western Europe, at 367,476 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Western Europe and Zimbabwe?
259,589 t, with Western Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Western Europe and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Western Europe and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Western Europe ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Western Europe vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/western-europe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/western-europe/zimbabwe/">Western Europe vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.